I donât think itâs really nice to attack a developer for having their own preferences as to what makes a chat app good? Just because itâs not for you doesnât mean itâs not useful for othersâŚ
I appreciate the direct and to the point language. Politicians are polite and non âattackingâ in language, but difficult to understand, and always taking your money by force, or implied force if you donât pay.
Telegraher is not made by politicians, itâs opensource and free. If you appreciate the force, i could add kind of BDSM features in. Need to make a list, which ones: âforce disconnectâ, âreply after 3 clicksâ or ârandomly deleted messagesâ. Lets think together, write me here.
About criticism - itâs opensource. Thats simple: you donât like something - make it better
If you canât make it better, explain your position in public issue or on any public platform. Then if noone accept your ideas⌠well, just deal with this, youâre an adult, learn the language and change the world.
Btw, some important point: the great Telegraher dev continue to develop this fork cause he donât care what other people say
It uses Telegram, a proprietary, non-free network service? For me that is end of discussion. Development is on Microsoftâs proprietary Github? For me that is another end of discussion.
As Licaon said, you canât fix a $hit platform with an open source client.
May I suggest XMPP for a more open source solution?
Yep, is uses Telegram, youâre noticed it finally?
About what Lica said i personally donât care cause simply youâre also donât care what iâm saying. Itâs kind of discussion with blind and deaf.
you cannot fix the shit platform
i fix the user experience
loop();
Next about github: i hate gitlab & bitbucket UI and github offer more features for fluid dev. Like i use debian11 for dev purposes & i edit my photos under windows10. I donât search for silverbullet. Go for strict opensource itâs like go vegan. Man, best experience & fun you get with different food, just choose it wisely. So i use the best instruments for the stuff i need to do. That comes with experience.
XMPP - thats ugly af. Iâm not looking for a replacement for TG for all my contacts (fun & work)
So, Telegraher itâs opensource messenger for Telegram, cause i still use telegram. Itâs made to make my experience better (i hate TG vanilla flow), and annoy the tg, the fanboys and other folks also.
When all my contacts will leave the TG i will switch TG to Signal or Matrix or anything else what could be fine for me and fork it also if i donât like something. I do that cause i can, and you donât do that cause you canât
Btw, @Albert201314 it will move on fdroid when i will clean well 8.8.5.
I still wanna read more about fdroid flow and building. Personally i find using fdroid resources for building 8 apks a bit abusive. So i wanna look also about having own repo synced with github CI/CD (when apks are build on free github resources) and synced with a repo and this repo simply added to fdroid (if thatâs possible).
Also i will change signature for app, actually it use public and simple dev keys. So everyone can make malicious APKs and share it for everyone and Android will accept it.
Notice that I didnât call it like that, just quoting your readme. That was the âshockâ.
Funny that the stuff you clean up are called the âepitome of modern messengersâ, which has itâs apex in âsiloed services (eg. no federation, closed source server)â, âforced features (eg. remote deletion)â, âsingle account tied to a real life token (eg. SIM card)â and âlies (eg. encrypted messenger but 99% donât know what a secret chat is and groups are never encrypted)â.
Donât get me wrong, I still find it funny that Telegram (and itâs forked clients) are in F-Droid while the security theater tweeter unicorn (ahem-signal-ahem) it is not.
Snikket? Monal? Conversation? Which one?
Anyway,
Why 8? Whatâs the deal with sdk23? How may downloads do you get for x86* builds these days?
I still find it funny that Telegram (and itâs forked clients) are in F-Droid while the security theater tweeter unicorn (ahem-signal-ahem) it is not.
Just wipe them all, bruh. Câmon do it! FB want to wipe altclients for FB & Insta. If if they canât do that from an outside, just kill it from inside. Be like these capitalists and make their dream come true
Keep only the foss apps for the foss services
XMPP - ugly af as is.
Why 8? Whatâs the deal with sdk23? How may downloads do you get for x86* builds these days?
i donât care seriously. People use what they wanna to use. I donât wanna be like most of devs and lock on mobile platforms only. Also i disabled emulator detect, so people can install x86 builds on emulators and do whatever they wanna do. To build these 8 apk cost for me nothing. And if i move on fdroid and fdroid says âyou canât build these 8 apks hereâ i will tell them âmmokayâ and i will use my own repo and apks still built on github using the githubactions with my own keys.
Difference between you and me is that i literally donât care what and how people are thinking. Whats trending, whats not⌠why 8 apks, why telegramâŚ
I just improve that app and remove the shit which annoying me.
Btw, folks, due cleaned xml permission files i removed sdk23 (no need anymore).
but arm7, arm8, x86 & x86_64 will be built always (4 apks instead of 8)
@Licaon_Kter hi, i wiped out gvision, but i think i will go with @Izzy 's repo:
apks are directlt picked from github ci/cd or the cd/cd where izzyâs repo is pointing
my signatures, so apks can be installed from github or from fdroid (via Izzyâs repo)
So in my case i will improve the readme (shorter + better) and i will check if github will be able to make 1 release with 4 apks inside (before itâs failed but for 8 due limitations for githubâs CI/CD, 6h max).
The size limit maybe is the more crucial one here â even a single arch build exceeds 35M (while the limit with my repo is 30M per app). Which arch to pick is a separate question: yes, when in doubt I pick armv7 as it covers the biggest part of the device cake, but on request I could also make that armv8/64.