I find it awesome how random people from the internet are suddenly the holders of absolute truth and know much more than Stallman, who created the GNU and the GPL.
He clearly stated that freedom to use is freedom to run and use the software for WHATEVER you want to do. He never said it’s the case you’re bringing up. Specifically this argument:
So yeah I’ll take your word for it, a random guy from the internet that happened to call me a nazi supporter for defending free speech, for defending human rights for everyone, with no exception.
Honestly, if you think your interpretation is the absolute truth and the correct one, I think you should be called RMS and not _cj. It’s like having a law that says “no type of discrimination against human beings is allowed” and then saying marginalized groups are allowed to discriminate people because they are marginalized. This is ridiculous.
Bring me proof that contradicts what Stallman said on his own article that I quoted and you didn’t even read it, otherwise you wouldn’t be blabbering about “oh your interpretation of freedom 0 is wrong it’s not about doing whatever you want with the software, but being able to use it blah blah blah”. Give me solid proof from the FSF or GNU itself that contradicts what Stallman wrote. And then I’ll believe you. You, and others, have failed to provide any solid proof that freedom 0 is not what Stallman said it is.